[PDF.48eq] The Meaning of 'Ought': Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics (Oxford Moral Theory)

The Meaning of 'Ought': Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics (Oxford Moral Theory)

[PDF.jf17] The Meaning of 'Ought': Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics (Oxford Moral Theory)

The Meaning of 'Ought':  Matthew Chrisman epub
The Meaning of 'Ought':  Matthew Chrisman pdf download
The Meaning of 'Ought':  Matthew Chrisman pdf file
The Meaning of 'Ought':  Matthew Chrisman audiobook
The Meaning of 'Ought':  Matthew Chrisman book review
The Meaning of 'Ought':  Matthew Chrisman summary

 | #2249508 in Books |  2015-10-23 | Original language:English | PDF # 1 |  6.40 x1.00 x9.20l,.0 | File type: PDF | 280 pages

---

||0 of 1 people found the following review helpful.| Fast shipping|By Customer|Thanks

The word 'ought' is one of the core normative terms, but it is also a modal word. In this book Matthew Chrisman develops a careful account of the semantics of 'ought' as a modal operator, and uses this to motivate a novel inferentialist account of why ought-sentences have the meaning that they have. This is a metanormative account that agrees with traditional descriptivist theories in metaethics that specifying the truth-conditions of normative sentences is a central par...

You can specify the type of files you want, for your gadget.The Meaning of 'Ought': Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics (Oxford Moral Theory)   |  Matthew Chrisman. I was recommended this book by a dear friend of mine.

Read Online Now